Neighborhood Marginalization and Labor Market Disparities in Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60758/laer.v36i.442Keywords:
Development Economics, Developing economiesAbstract
This study examines the relationship between neighborhood marginalization and labor market outcomes in Mexico from 2010 to 2020. Using census data combined with CONAPO marginalization index, we estimate two-way fixed-effects models controlling for individual, labor market, municipal, and temporal factors. A 10-point increase in marginalization is associated with a 1.1% rise in participation, no change in total employment, a 7.6% decline in formal employment, a 5.4% increase in informal employment, and a 15.1% decrease in wages. These patterns are robust across commuting distance, distance to the state capital, urban samples, and lowmarginalization-variance municipalities. Non-linear results show that participation rises in highly marginalized deciles, while formal employment and wages fall sharply. Men experience a larger wage penalty (-16.0%) than women (-12.6%), while women are more likely to work informally. Older workers (55–65) show the largest participation increase but also the steepest wage loss. The findings highlight persistent structural barriers limiting access to quality jobs and earnings, as well as sharp heterogeneities across gender, age groups, and spatial contexts, which can help inform more targeted and place-based policy interventions.
References
Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. (2001). Disentangling area effects: Evidence from
deprived and non-deprived neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 38 (12), 2277-2298.
Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087162 doi: 10.1080/
Brooks-Gunn, J., & Duncan, G. J. (1997). The effects of poverty on children. The Future of Children, 7 (2), 55–71. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1602387
Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of economic surveys, 22 (1), 31–72.
Chetty, R., & Hendren, N. (2018a, 08). The impacts of neighborhoods on intergenerational mobility i: Childhood exposure effects*. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133 , 1107-1162. doi: 10.1093/QJE/QJY007
Chetty, R., & Hendren, N. (2018b). The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational
Mobility II: County-Level Estimates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133 (3),
-1228.
DeLuca, S., Duncan, G., Keels, M., & Mendenhall, R. (2012, December 1). The notable and the null: Using mixed methods to understand the diverse impacts of residential mobility programs. In Neighbourhood effects research (Vol. 9789400723092, pp. 195–223). Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2-9
Dietz, R. (2002, 12). The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences: An interdisciplinary approach. Social Science Research, 31 , 539-575. doi: 10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00005-4
Durlauf, S. (2004). “neighborhood effects”. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 4, p. 2173-2242). Elsevier. Retrieved from https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:regchp:4-50
Ellen, I. G., & Turner, M. A. (1997). Does neighborhood matter? assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8 (4), 833-866. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1997.9521280 doi: 10.1080/10511482.1997.9521280
Elliott, J. (2005, 04). Social isolation and labor market insulation: Network and neighborhood effects on less-educated urban workers. The Sociological Quarterly, 40 , 199- 216. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1999.tb00545.
Galster, G. (2002). An economic efficiency analysis of deconcentrating poverty populations. Journal of Housing Economics, 11 (4), 303 - 329. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051137702001225 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1051-1377(02)00122-5
Galster, G. (2013, 12). The mechanism(s) of neighbourhood effects: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives, 23-56. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2-2
Galster, G., Andersson, R., Musterd, S., & Kauppinen, T. (2008, 02). Does neighborhood income mix affect earnings of adults? new evidence from sweden. Journal of Urban Economics, 63 , 858-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2007.07.002
Galster, G., Santiago, A., Stack, L., & Cutsinger, J. (2016). Neighborhood ef-
fects on secondary school performance of latino and african american youth: Evidence from a natural experiment in denver. Journal of Urban Economics, 93 ,
- 48. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
S0094119016000127 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2016.02.004
Gobillon, L., Selod, H., & Zenou, Y. (2007). The mechanisms of spatial mismatch.
Urban Studies, 44 (12), 2401-2427. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/
doi: 10.1080/00420980701540937
Harding, D. J. (2003). Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: The effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy. American journal of Sociology, 109 (3), 676–719.
Ihlanfeldt, K. R., & Sjoquist, D. L. (1998). The spatial mismatch hypothesis: A review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform. Housing Policy Debate, 9 (4), 849-892. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1998.9521321 doi:
1080/10511482.1998.9521321
Ioannides, Y. M. (2002). Residential neighborhood effects. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32 (2), 145 - 165. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166046201000825 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(01)00082-5
Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighbourhood. Inner city poverty in the United States, 2 , 111-186.
Kain, J. F. (1968, 05). Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82 (2), 175-197. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/1885893 doi: 10.2307/1885893
Katz, L., Duncan, G., Kling, J., Kessler, R. C., Ludwig, J., Sanbonmatsu, L., & Liebman,J. (2008). What can we learn about neighborhood effects from the moving to opportunity experiment? (Scholarly Articles). Harvard University Department of Economics. Retrieved from https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:faseco:2766959
Labov, W. (2006, 01). Unendangered dialects, endangered people. Sustaining Linguistic Diversity: Endangered and Minority Languages and Language Varieties.
Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000, 04). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological bulletin, 126 , 309-37. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.309
Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification problems in the social sciences. Sociological Methodology, 23 , 1–56. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/271005
Manski, C. F. (2000, September). Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal ofEconomic Perspectives, 14 (3), 115-136. Retrieved from https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.14.3.115 doi: 10.1257/jep.14.3.115
Mayer, S. E., & Jencks, C. (1989). Growing up in poor neighborhoods: How much
does it matter? Science, 243 (4897), 1441–1445. Retrieved from https://science
.sciencemag.org/content/243/4897/1441 doi: 10.1126/science.243.4897.1441
Musterd, S., & Andersson, R. (2005, 07). Housing mix, social mix, and social opportunities. Urban Affairs Review - URBAN AFF REV , 40 , 761-790. doi: 10.1177/ 1078087405276006
Oreopoulos, P. (2003, 11). The Long-Run Consequences of Living in a Poor Neighborhood*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (4), 1533-1575. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552865 doi: 10.1162/003355303322552865
Pinkster, F., & Volker, B. (2009, 03). Local social networks and social resources
in two dutch neighbourhoods. Housing Studies, 24 , 225-242. doi: 10.1080/
Propper, C., Burgess, S., Bolster, A., Leckie, G., Jones, K., & Johnston, R. (2007).
The impact of neighbourhood on the income and mental health of british social
renters. Urban Studies, 44 (2), 393-415. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/
doi: 10.1080/00420980601075067
Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (1999). “ecometrics”: Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociological Methodology, 29 , 1-41.
Sampson, R. (2011, 01).
Neighborhood effects, causal mechanisms and the social structure
of the city. Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms, 227-249. doi: 10.1017/
CBO9780511921315.012
Sari, F. (2012). Analysis of neighbourhood effects and work behaviour: Evidence from paris. Housing Studies, 27 (1), 45-76. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/
2012.629642 doi: 10.1080/02673037.2012.629642
Sharkey, P., & Faber, J. W. (2014). Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annual Review of Sociology, 40 (1), 559-579. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043350 doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043350
Small, M., & Newman, K. (2001, 08). Urban poverty after the truly disadvantaged: The rediscovery of the family, the neighborhood, and culture. Annu. Rev. Sociol , 27 ,23-45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.23
Small, M. L., & Feldman, J. (2012). Ethnographic evidence, heterogeneity, and neighbourhood effects after moving to opportunity. In Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives (pp. 57–77). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2_3 doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2_3
Tienda, M. (1991, 01). Poor people and poor places: Deciphering neighborhood effects on poverty outcomes. Macro-micro linkages in sociology.
Van Ham, M., & Manley, D. (2010, March). The effect of neighbourhood housing tenure mix on labour market outcomes: a longitudinal investigation of neighbourhood effects. Journal of Economic Geography, 10 (2), 257–282. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbp017
Vilalta Perdomo, C. J. (2008, 08). Comentarios y mediciones sobre la segregación espacial en la ciudad de méxico. Estudios demográficos y urbanos, 23 , 375 - 413. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0186-72102008000200375&nrm=iso
Wilson, W. J. (2012). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http:// id.lib.harvard.edu/alma/990133472830203941/catalog
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Federico Niccolo' Daverio, J. Miguel Manrique-Velasco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
LAER Copyright and License
Authors submitting articles to Latin American Economic Review (LAER), automatically grant this journal a license to publish. Copyright of all published material remains with the authors, who can reuse it in future work without needing to make reference to LAER. Similarly, any other contribution of material to the website (for example text, photographs, graphics, video or audio) automatically grants us a right to publish. Copyright, however, remains with the author(s).
Authors release their work under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the use has no derivatives, is non-commercial and appropriate credit to the author(s) is given. (If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.)
A human-readable summary of the licence:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Full legal text:
