The role of innovation in employment growth, skill demand, and wages
Evidence from Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47872/laer.v32.111Abstract
This study’s main objective is assessing the effects of innovation on firms’ employment growth. Further, we aimed to examine the quality of jobs in terms of skills and wages. By applying a structural modeling ap- proach, four types of innovation were considered—namely, product, process, organizational, and marketing. This is the first study to evaluate the role of marketing in depth in this context. We predominantly utilized the database from Ecuador’s 2013 National Survey of Innovation Activities (with firm-level information from 2009–2011). Our results show that innovation exhibits a net effect on employment and contributes to the improvement of job quality. Specifically, product and marketing innovations emerge as important tools for increasing employment in Ecuador. Moreover, product innovation favors high-skilled over low-skilled work- ers. Finally, innovative firms pay higher wages. Therefore, we provide evidence for a developing country on the relevant role of innovation in employment growth, skills demand, and the payment of higher wages.
References
References
Aboal, D., Garda, P., Lanzilotta, B., Perera, M., 2015. Innovation, firm size, tech-nology intensity, and employment generation: evidence from the Uruguayan manufacturing sector. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 51(1), 3-26.
Acemoglu, D., 1998. Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 1055-1089.
Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., 1988. Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 678-690.
Álvarez, R., Benavente, M., Campusano, R., Cuevas, C., 2011. Employment genera-tion, firm size, and innovation in Chile. IDB-TN 319.
Audretsch, D.B., Klomp, L., Santarelli, E., Thurik A.R., 2004. Gibrats Law: Are the services different? Review of Industrial Organization 24, 301-324.
Autor, D.H., Dorn, D, 2013. The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polariza-tion of the US labor market. American Economic Review 103(5), 1553-1597.
Barras, R., 1986. Towards a theory of innovation in services. Research Policy 15, 161-173.
Benavente, J.M., Lauterbach, R., 2008. Technological innovation and employment: complements or substitutes? The European Journal of Development Research 20(2), 318-329.
Bogliacino, F., Lucchese, M., 2016. Endogenous skill biased technical change: test-ing for demand pull effect. Industrial and Corporate Change 25, 227-243.
Bontempi, M.E., Mairesse, J., 2015. Intangible capital and productivity at the firm level: a panel data assessment. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 24(1-2), 22-51.
Caroli, E., Van Reenen, J., 2001. Skill biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4), 1149-1192.
Cirera, X., Sabetti, L., 2019. The effects of innovation on employment in developing countries: evidence from enterprise surveys. Industrial and Corporate Change 28(1), 161-176.
Corrado, C., Hulten, C., Sichel, D. 2009. Intangible capital and U.S. economic growth. Review of Income and Wealth 55(3), 661-685.
Crass, D., Peters, B., 2014. Intangible assets and firm-level productivity. Discussion Paper No. 14_120, Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW).
Crespi, G., Tacsir, E., Pereira, M., 2019. Effects of Innovation on Employment in Latin America. Industrial and Corporate Change 28(1), 139-159.
Dachs, B., Hud, M., Koehler, C., Peters, B., 2017. Employment effects of innova-tions over the business cycle: firm-level evidence from European countries. SPRU SWPS 2017-03.
Dachs, B., Peters, B., 2014. Innovation, employment growth, and foreign ownership of firms: A European perspective. Research Policy 43, 214-232.
Damijan, J.P., Kostevc, C., Stare, M., 2014. Impact of innovation on employment and skill upgrading of firms. Simpatic Working Paper No. 7.
De Elejalde, R., Giuliodori, D., Stucchi, R., 2011. Employment Generation, Firms Size and Innovation: Microeconometric Evidence from Argentina. IDB-TN 313.
De Elejalde, R., Giuliodori, D., Stucchi, R., 2015. Employment and Innovation: Firm-Level Evidence from Argentina. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 51, 27-47.
Evangelista, R., Vezzani, A., 2012. The impact of technological and organizational innovations on employment in European firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 21, 871-899.
Falk, M., 2015. Employment effects of technological and organizational innova-tions: Evidence based on linked Firm-Level Data for Austria, Journal of Economics and Statistics 253(3), 268-285.
García, A., Jaumandreu, J., Rodríguez, C., 2004. Innovation and jobs: evidence from manufacturing firms. MPRA Paper No. 1204.
Gibrat, R., 1931. Les inegalites economiques; applications: aux inegalite's des ri-chesses, a la concentration des entreprises, aux populations des villes, aux statistiques des familles, etc., d'une loi nouvelle, la loi de l'effet proportionnel. Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.
Giuri, P., Torrisi, S., Zinovyeva, N., 2008. ICT, skills, and organizational change: ev-idence from Italian manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 17, 29-64.
Greenan, N., 2003. Organizational change, technology, employment and skills: an empirical study of French manufacturing. Cambridge Journal of Economics 27, 287-316.
Hall, B.H., Lotti, F., Mairesse, J., 2008. Employment, innovation, and productivity: evidence from Italian microdata. Industrial and Corporate Change 17, 813-839.
Harrison, R., Jaumandreu, J., Mairesse, J., Peters, B., 2008. Does innovation stimu-late employment? A firm-level analysis using comparable micro-data from four European countries. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 14216.
Harrison, R., Jaumandreu, J., Mairesse, J., Peters, B., 2014. Does innovation stimu-late employment? A firm-level analysis using comparable micro-data from four European countries. International Journal of Industrial Organization 35, 29-43.
International Labour Office, 2009. Guide to the New Millennium Development Goals Employment Indicators: including the Full Set of Decent Work Indicators. ILO, Ge-neva.
Jaumandreu, J., 2003. Does innovation spur employment? A firm-level analysis us-ing Spanish CIS data. Mimeo.
Lederman, D., Messina, J., Pienknagura, S., Rigolini, J., 2013. Latin American En-trepreneurs: Many Firms but Little Innovation. World Bank Publications.
Marouani, M.A., Nilsson, B., 2016. The labor market effects of skill-biased techno-logical change in Malaysia. Econ. Model. 57, 55-75.
Monge-González, R., Rodríguez-Alvarez, J., Hewitt, J., Orozo, J., Ruiz, K., 2011. Innovation and Employment growth in Costa Rica a Firm-level Analysis. IDB-TN 318.
OECD, 1997. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technologi-cal Innovation Data. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing, Paris.
OECD, 2002. Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development.
OECD/Eurostat (2005), “Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activi-ties”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD, 2006. Innovation and Knowledge-Intensive Service Activities. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD, 2007. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2007. Organi-sation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Olley, G.S., Pakes, A., 1996. The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunica-tions Equipment Industry. Econometrica 64(6), 1263-1297.
Peters, B., 2008. Innovation and firm performance: an empirical investigation for German firms. ZEW Economic Studies No. 38, Mannheim.
Peters, B., Riley, R., Siedschlag, I., 2013. The Influence of Technological and Non-Technological Innovation on Employment Growth in European Service Firms. Servicegap Discussion Paper 40.
Pianta, M., 2005. Innovation and Employment, in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., Nel-son, R.R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 568-598.
Piva, M., Vivarelli, M., 2002. The skill bias: comparative evidence and an economet-ric test. International Review of Applied Economics 16(3), 347-358.
Piva, M., Santarelli, E., Vivarelli, M., 2005. The skill bias effect of technological and organisational change: evidence and policy implications. Research Policy 34(2), 141-157.
Presidencia de la República del Ecuador, 2011. Reglamentos al Código de la Pro-ducción.
Registro Oficial, 2010. Código Orgánico de la Producción Comercio e Inversiones. 351.
Rodríguez-Moreno, J.A., Rochina-Barrachina, M.E., 2015. Innovación y productivi-dad en las empresas manufactureras ecuatorianas. Cuadernos económicos de ICE , 107-136.
Rodríguez-Moreno, J.A., Rochina-Barrachina, M.E., 2019. ICT use, investments in R&D and workers’ training, firms’ productivity and markups: the case of Ecuadorian man-ufacturing. The European Journal of Development Research 31, 1063-1106.
Schumpeter, J., 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Bros.
Schwartz, L., Guaipatín, C., 2014. Ecuador: Análisis del Sistema Nacional de Inno-vación: Hacia la consolidación de una cultura innovadora. IDB-MG-223.
Som, O., Diekmann, J., Solberg, E., Schricke, E., Schubert, T., Jung-Erceg, P., Stehnken, T., Daimer, S., 2012. Organizational and marketing innovation - promises and pitfalls? PRO INNO Europe: INNO-Grips II report, Brussels: European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry.
Stock, J., Yogo, M., 2005. Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vivarelli, M., 2013. Technology, employment and skills: an interpretative frame-work. Eurasian Business Review 3, 66-89.
Vivarelli, M., 2014. Innovation, Employment and Skills in Advanced and Develop-ing Countries: A Survey of Economic Literature. Journal of Economic Issues 48, 123-154.
WIPO, 2018. The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Inno-vation. Geneva, https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2018-report.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-01-30 (2)
- 2023-01-30 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Engracia Rochina Barrachina, Jorge Antonio Rodríguez Moreno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
LAER Copyright and License
Authors submitting articles to Latin American Economic Review (LAER), automatically grant this journal a license to publish. Copyright of all published material remains with the authors, who can reuse it in future work without needing to make reference to LAER. Similarly, any other contribution of material to the website (for example text, photographs, graphics, video or audio) automatically grants us a right to publish. Copyright, however, remains with the author(s).
Authors release their work under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license allows anyone to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the use has no derivatives, is non-commercial and appropriate credit to the author(s) is given. (If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.)
A human-readable summary of the licence:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Full legal text: